Berdasarkan hasil analisis data pengaruh pupuk, bibit, pemeliharaan, dan luas lahan terhadap jumlah produksi pepaya secara parsial dan simultan, diketahui bahwa pada uji hipotesis (uji t) menunjukan bahwa pupuk berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah produksi pepaya dengan nilai t hitung x1 (2,193)>t tabel (1,708), dimana jika pupuk mengalami kenaikan sebesar 1 kg, maka jumlah produksi pepaya akan mengalami kenaikan sebesar 0,463 kg. bibit berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah produksi pepaya dengan nilai t hitung x2 (2,047)>t tabel (1,708), dimana jika bibit mengalami kenaikan 1 pokok, maka jumlah produksi pepaya akan mengalami kenaikan sebesar 0,716 kg. biaya pemeliharaan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah produksi pepaya dengan nilai t hitung x3 (1,982)>t tabel (1,708), jika biaya pemeliharaan terjadi perubahan sebesar rp. 1.000, maka jumlah produksi pepaya akan mengalami kenaikan sebesar 0,146 kg. luas lahan tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah produksi pepaya dengan nilai t hitung x4 (-1,339)f tabel (2,19) dan nilai sig. f hitung (0,000

Data analysis showed the effect of fertilizer,seed,maintenance, and land area on the amount of papaya production partially and simultaneously. it was known that the hypothesis test (t-test) showed that fertilizer had a significant effect on the amount of papaya production with a t-value of x1 (2,193) >t table (1.708), where if the fertilizer increased by 1 kg, then the amount of papaya production increased by0.463 kg. seeds had a significant effect on the amount of papaya production with a value oft arithmetic x2 (2.047) >t table (1.708), where if the seed had an increase of 1 tree, then the amount of papaya production increased by 0.716 kg. maintenance costs had a significant effect on the amount of papaya production with the value of t count x3 (1.982) > t table (1.708). if the maintenance costs change by rp. 1.000, then papaya production increased by 0. 146 kg. land area had no significant effect on the amount of papaya production with the value oft count x4 (-1.339) f table (2,19) and sig. value of f count (0.000